Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

If you have read Peter Singer’s book, The Life You Can Save, and have not adjusted your giving (increased it) – I’d love to hear from you.

Singer writes from a ethics point of view (i.e. think philosophy and logic models) – and throws in some emotional arguements for good measure.  Are we giving enough?  Are you giving enough to the right causes?  To the right organizations?  What is enough?  Enough can mean different things to different people.  How do you determine enough?

Singer does.  Generally, its 5% of your pre-tax income.  He’s specific about where he’d like us to give – to alleviate global poverty.

What’s not as simple is why people don’t give.  Among many reasons, “fairness” stole my attention.  Singer asks us how we’d feel if we just gave our first big 5% donation, and then visited our neighbors back from vacation – tanned, relaxed, and with tales of adventure.  Or look at it this way:

Imagine you came upon a pond where there were 9 other people standing there and 10 children were going to drown. You wade into to help a child and on your way back you realize that only 2 other people are helping, while one is just standing there watching and the other 6 have wandered off.

Once you’ve saved one child, do you just leave? Probably not, you’d probably go in to get another. And what about a third child? You’d probably want to go yell or hit the person just standing there watching, but once you realize that a child will drown if you don’t save it, you will probably help.

In this instance, your action is what matters.  The inaction of others wouldn’t stop you from trying to save the children.  You’d probably try to save as many as you could.

Singer writes, their inaction simply makes them irrelevant.

Perhaps, its a tough word, a tough concept to swallow.  But it sticks with me.  I do this work because I don’t believe in being irrelevant.  It’s not about fairness; it’s about action.

Read the book.  Let me know what you think.

Want to find your suggested contribution?  Give it a go.

Pin It on Pinterest

Revisit consent button
Close
Dr. Michele Fugiel Gartner, CAP