Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

This post began as an innocent nod to the Calgary Microcredit Conference that is taking place on September 11. In Alberta, just as in many places, we are seeing folks come forward into the nonprofit sector and social space who want to do more than donate their money.

For readers of SocialFinance.ca, this isn’t necessarily new. But for everyday donors, hearing from Matt Flannery from Kiva and on micro-savings from the Gates Foundation, it will change they way they engage in solving social issues.

Ten years ago, this same sentiment, changing the way donors engage, is what birthed the Social Venture Partners movement – offering donors the ability to do more than write a cheque. At that time, doing more meant that they would add their time and professional skills into the mix. Still, at the end of the day, their financial contribution was still a charitable donation.

Ten years later, appetites are increasing. We know this from initiatives like Kiva, but we’re seeing it on a local level as well. Folks are hearing about the success of micro-lending and are wondering what it would mean to contribute to a loan fund – and possibly make a financial return? For SVP Calgary, we’re consider what microcredit or a loan fund would look like, and what it would accomplish on a local level (vs. the international scale we’re use to seeing.)

It’s easy to be swayed by the bright lights of social enterprise and impact investing. The models are alluring especially in contrast to the continuing reports of the dismal state of the nonprofit sector – from funding to staffing to service wait lists. Social enterprise gives non-profits hope for sustainability and investment opportunities lure donors who are numb from writing cheques.

For donors that I know, investing in social change triggers another side of them. They are intrigued by what it would mean for how their money is put to use – and yes, there might be a financial return. What is unclear, as somewhat witnessed in the Unitus and SKS controversy, is what is ethically correct to do with a financial return? Reinvest as folks at Kiva are likely to do? Or walk away, somewhat more well off and having helped out? Who decides?

When we get down to the nitty-gritty, these are value based questions. What do we value – charitable giving, social change, return on investment? In full disclosure, I’ve been on all sides of this debate – writing on a previous occasion about ethics in philanthropy.

Asking ourselves about what we value in social enterprise is increasingly important – even if the entire field doesn’t achieve a consensus. At the end of the day, the question becomes “If I’ve done something good for the world and gotten a perk myself, is that a bad thing?” It’s a value judgment.

At some point, as more organizations reach success with their loan and equity offerings, we’ll need to ask ourselves more questions. Whether the answers continue to reside on an organization by organization basis will be seen. As I see it, social enterprise simply by having enterprise in its name is already leaning to one side – and it’ll be interesting to see how the existing divisions within the space become more apparent with increased trial and error.

The Calgary Microcredit Conference on September 11 is being hosted by Uend:poverty, Rotarian Action Group for Microcredit (RAGM), and the Rotary District 5360 Microcredit Task Force.

Pin It on Pinterest

Revisit consent button
Close
Dr. Michele Fugiel Gartner, CAP